Spotify Can't Live on $10 a Month
Should Spotify specialize its subscription service to offer exclusive content to fans of specific genres? Leila Abboud and Shira Ovide dig deep into Spotify's business model to discover where the flaws are.This article originally appeared on Bloomberg
With Spotify shooting for a public listing next year, it's time for the leading independent music-streaming service to step up its game. No more blaming the big, bad record labels for everything. No more excuses for why the business remains stubbornly unprofitable despite doubling revenue last year and adding subscribers rapidly.
Spotify does suffer from paying 70 percent or more of its revenue to the music industry, but those fees are not necessarily a death sentence. So here is some advice: Spotify should take a baseball bat to its pricing structure, namely the $9.99 monthly cost for its all-you-can-eat subscription service. That price -- now a standard for comparable streaming offers from Apple, Tidal, Deezer and others -- is an artifact of the record-store business model. It became obsolete long ago.
Spotify is growing fast but remains unprofitable because of the high proportion of revenue it pays out in licensing fees to music labels and publishers
Spotify should start segmenting the market to appeal to more people, a tactic prevalent in other subscription businesses like video games and cable TV packages. Why not a $3.99 offer limited to country music? Or a $7.99 monthly subscription for dance music fans fortified with exclusive playlists or live streams from Ibiza clubs? Then get creative with a premium option for $19.99 a month featuring high-quality sound and other goodies.The Big Three record labels control most of the supply of popular music, and they may have to bend their terms for Spotify to experiment with its monthly cost. They do capitulate when it suits them. The labels are negotiating for a $4 or $5 monthly limited music streaming option that would work only through Amazon's Echo home speaker. And Spotify is powerful enough to throw its weight around with the music powers, as it's doing to punish musicians with Apple Music or Tidal exclusives. Spotify accounts for more than 10 percent of the record labels' revenue, Bloomberg News has reported.Deviating from the flat $10 monthly subscription is more complex for prospective users and for Spotify itself. Any mid-tier, cheaper offer must be structured carefully so as not to cannibalize the base nor result in money being lost on each customer. Spotify's deals with record labels, which are being renegotiated, include minimum guaranteed payments plus a fee for each song streamed, so it can't cut prices too deeply.
Nevertheless, more price points would be good for Spotify's central mission: persuading more people to sign up for paid subscriptions. Spotify has three times more users for its free music-streaming option, which includes ads, than its 39 million paid customers as of June. We're not necessarily calling for a future where no music is available without tolls. But Spotify's free option is too good, and Spotify makes 90 percent of its revenue from the paying subscribers. It needs more of them to become sustainable. Only about 10 percent of music buyers spend $10 or more a month on music, across all recorded formats, and most of those have already been converted to subscriptions, according to music analyst Mark Mulligan. Spotify needs to give the masses a way to get on board for less and then try to migrate some to the full-priced product.